Command R+ vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick is significantly cheaper at $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens vs $2.50/$10.00. Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1160. Llama 4 Maverick is faster at 90 tokens/sec vs 65 tokens/sec. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1200. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand R+Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderCohereMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.50$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens$10.00$0.600
Context Window128K1.048576M
Max Output Tokens4,09632,768
Arena ELO1,2001,290
Coding ELO1,1601,280
TTFT (ms)350250
Tokens/sec6590
MultimodalNoYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoYes
When to Use Command R+

Choose Command R+ when you need: best-in-class rag capabilities, excellent citation and grounding, strong multilingual support, enterprise-focused features. It excels at rag, enterprise, multilingual, search tasks.

Strengths:

  • Best-in-class RAG capabilities
  • Excellent citation and grounding
  • Strong multilingual support
  • Enterprise-focused features

Best for:

ragenterprisemultilingualsearch
When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Open-source model with strong performance
  • Very affordable via hosted providers
  • 1M context window
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons