Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen 2.5 Max: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1250. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1260. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickQwen 2.5 Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.200$0.160
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$0.640
Context Window1.048576M128K
Max Output Tokens32,7688,192
Arena ELO1,2901,260
Coding ELO1,2801,250
TTFT (ms)250240
Tokens/sec9080
MultimodalYesNo
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesNo
When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Open-source model with strong performance
  • Very affordable via hosted providers
  • 1M context window
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source
When to Use Qwen 2.5 Max

Choose Qwen 2.5 Max when you need: extremely competitive pricing, strong coding and general capabilities, open-source model available, good multilingual support including chinese. It excels at coding, general-purpose, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks.

Strengths:

  • Extremely competitive pricing
  • Strong coding and general capabilities
  • Open-source model available
  • Good multilingual support including Chinese

Best for:

codinggeneral-purposecost-sensitiveopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons