Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.30 per million tokens vs $0.20/$0.60. Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1230. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1250. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger 10486K context window vs 1049K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Scout
ProviderMetaMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.200$0.100
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$0.300
Context Window1.048576M10.48576M
Max Output Tokens32,76832,768
Arena ELO1,2901,250
Coding ELO1,2801,230
TTFT (ms)250200
Tokens/sec90110
MultimodalYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesYes
When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks.

Strengths:

  • Open-source model with strong performance
  • Very affordable via hosted providers
  • 1M context window
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source
When to Use Llama 4 Scout

Choose Llama 4 Scout when you need: 10m token context window, very affordable, open-source and self-hostable, good general performance. It excels at long-context, chatbots, cost-sensitive, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 10486K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • 10M token context window
  • Very affordable
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Good general performance

Best for:

long-contextchatbotscost-sensitiveopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons