Command R+ vs GPT-4.1: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

GPT-4.1 is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1320 vs 1160. GPT-4.1 is faster at 88 tokens/sec vs 65 tokens/sec. GPT-4.1 ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1200. GPT-4.1 offers a larger 1048K context window vs 128K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCommand R+GPT-4.1
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Input Price / 1M tokens$2.50$2.00
Output Price / 1M tokens$10.00$8.00
Context Window128K1.047576M
Max Output Tokens4,09632,768
Arena ELO1,2001,290
Coding ELO1,1601,320
TTFT (ms)350260
Tokens/sec6588
MultimodalNoYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionNoYes
When to Use Command R+

Choose Command R+ when you need: best-in-class rag capabilities, excellent citation and grounding, strong multilingual support, enterprise-focused features. It excels at rag, enterprise, multilingual, search tasks.

Strengths:

  • Best-in-class RAG capabilities
  • Excellent citation and grounding
  • Strong multilingual support
  • Enterprise-focused features

Best for:

ragenterprisemultilingualsearch
When to Use GPT-4.1

Choose GPT-4.1 when you need: 1m token context window, excellent coding performance, strong instruction following, competitive pricing for its capability. It excels at coding, long-context, agents, general-purpose tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1048K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • 1M token context window
  • Excellent coding performance
  • Strong instruction following
  • Competitive pricing for its capability

Best for:

codinglong-contextagentsgeneral-purpose

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons