Claude Haiku 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick is significantly cheaper at $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens vs $0.80/$4.00. Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1195. Claude Haiku 4 is faster at 130 tokens/sec vs 90 tokens/sec. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1220. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 200K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureClaude Haiku 4Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.800$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens$4.00$0.600
Context Window200K1.048576M
Max Output Tokens8,19232,768
Arena ELO1,2201,290
Coding ELO1,1951,280
TTFT (ms)150250
Tokens/sec13090
MultimodalYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesYes
When to Use Claude Haiku 4

Choose Claude Haiku 4 when you need: very fast response times, 200k context window, affordable for anthropic quality, good instruction following. It excels at chatbots, classification, cost-sensitive, high-volume tasks.

Strengths:

  • Very fast response times
  • 200K context window
  • Affordable for Anthropic quality
  • Good instruction following

Best for:

chatbotsclassificationcost-sensitivehigh-volume
When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Open-source model with strong performance
  • Very affordable via hosted providers
  • 1M context window
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons