GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1200. GPT-4o Mini is faster at 120 tokens/sec vs 90 tokens/sec. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1220. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger 1049K context window vs 128K.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGPT-4o MiniLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.150$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.600$0.600
Context Window128K1.048576M
Max Output Tokens16,38432,768
Arena ELO1,2201,290
Coding ELO1,2001,280
TTFT (ms)180250
Tokens/sec12090
MultimodalYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesYes
When to Use GPT-4o Mini

Choose GPT-4o Mini when you need: extremely affordable pricing, fast response times, strong for its price tier, good multimodal support. It excels at chatbots, lightweight-tasks, cost-sensitive tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two.

Strengths:

  • Extremely affordable pricing
  • Fast response times
  • Strong for its price tier
  • Good multimodal support

Best for:

chatbotslightweight-taskscost-sensitive
When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Open-source model with strong performance
  • Very affordable via hosted providers
  • 1M context window
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons