GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

GPT-4.1 Nano is significantly cheaper at $0.10/$0.40 per million tokens vs $0.20/$0.60. Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1150. GPT-4.1 Nano is faster at 150 tokens/sec vs 90 tokens/sec. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1180.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1 NanoLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.100$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.400$0.600
Context Window1.047576M1.048576M
Max Output Tokens32,76832,768
Arena ELO1,1801,290
Coding ELO1,1501,280
TTFT (ms)130250
Tokens/sec15090
MultimodalYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesYes
When to Use GPT-4.1 Nano

Choose GPT-4.1 Nano when you need: ultra-low pricing, 1m context window, very fast inference, ideal for simple tasks at scale. It excels at chatbots, classification, cost-sensitive, high-volume tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two.

Strengths:

  • Ultra-low pricing
  • 1M context window
  • Very fast inference
  • Ideal for simple tasks at scale

Best for:

chatbotsclassificationcost-sensitivehigh-volume
When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Open-source model with strong performance
  • Very affordable via hosted providers
  • 1M context window
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons