GPT-4.1 Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick: Pricing, Benchmarks & Verdict (2026)

Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick is significantly cheaper at $0.20/$0.60 per million tokens vs $0.40/$1.60. Llama 4 Maverick is stronger for coding with a coding ELO of 1280 vs 1230. Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher overall with an Arena ELO of 1290 vs 1240.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1 MiniLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Input Price / 1M tokens$0.400$0.200
Output Price / 1M tokens$1.60$0.600
Context Window1.047576M1.048576M
Max Output Tokens32,76832,768
Arena ELO1,2401,290
Coding ELO1,2301,280
TTFT (ms)190250
Tokens/sec11590
MultimodalYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
VisionYesYes
When to Use GPT-4.1 Mini

Choose GPT-4.1 Mini when you need: 1m token context window at low cost, great balance of speed and quality, strong coding for a mini model, affordable for high-volume use. It excels at chatbots, long-context, cost-sensitive tasks.

Strengths:

  • 1M token context window at low cost
  • Great balance of speed and quality
  • Strong coding for a mini model
  • Affordable for high-volume use

Best for:

chatbotslong-contextcost-sensitive
When to Use Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when you need: open-source model with strong performance, very affordable via hosted providers, 1m context window, mixture-of-experts architecture. It excels at chatbots, coding, general-purpose, open-source tasks. It is also the more cost-effective option between the two. Its 1049K context window is larger, making it better for long-document processing.

Strengths:

  • Open-source model with strong performance
  • Very affordable via hosted providers
  • 1M context window
  • Mixture-of-experts architecture

Best for:

chatbotscodinggeneral-purposeopen-source

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons