Haystack vs Semantic Kernel (2026)

A detailed comparison of Haystack and Semantic Kernel covering features, pricing, platform support, and more.

Verdict

Both Haystack and Semantic Kernel are strong options. Haystack stands out for open-source and free, while Semantic Kernel excels at microsoft-backed. Your choice depends on your team's workflow and priorities.

Feature Comparison

FeatureHaystackSemantic Kernel
LLM orchestrationYesNo
Retrieval-augmented generationYesNo
Component-based architectureYesNo
Multiple LLM supportYesNo
Document processingYesNo
Pipeline buildingYesNo
Evaluation frameworkYesNo
LLM integrationNoYes
Plugin architectureNoYes
Memory managementNoYes
Skill compositionNoYes
Function callingNoYes
Multi-language supportNoYes
Azure OpenAI integrationNoYes

Pricing Comparison

DetailHaystackSemantic Kernel
Free TierYesYes
Free Tier DetailsOpen-source frameworkOpen-source SDK
Starting PriceFreeFree

Pros & Cons

Haystack

Strengths

  • +Open-source and free
  • +Flexible architecture
  • +Great documentation
  • +Active community

Limitations

  • -Steeper learning curve
  • -Smaller ecosystem than LangChain
  • -Requires more manual setup

Platforms

webapi
Semantic Kernel

Strengths

  • +Microsoft-backed
  • +Strong Azure integration
  • +Plugin architecture
  • +Good documentation

Limitations

  • -Smaller community than LangChain
  • -Less mature ecosystem
  • -Windows-focused initially

Platforms

webwindowslinuxapi

Related Tool Comparisons