Continue vs Cursor (2026)

A detailed comparison of Continue and Cursor covering features, pricing, platform support, and more.

Verdict

Both Continue and Cursor are strong options. Continue stands out for fully open source, while Cursor excels at excellent multi-file editing with composer. Your choice depends on your team's workflow and priorities.

Feature Comparison

FeatureContinueCursor
VS Code and JetBrains extensionYesNo
Code autocompleteYesNo
Chat with codebaseYesYes
Custom model configurationYesNo
Local model supportYesNo
Context providersYesNo
AI code completionNoYes
Multi-file editingNoYes
Terminal command generationNoYes
Codebase indexingNoYes
Custom model selectionNoYes

Pricing Comparison

DetailContinueCursor
Free TierYesYes
Free Tier DetailsFully open source, bring your own API keys or use free local modelsHobby plan with 2000 completions and 50 slow premium requests/month
Starting PriceFreeFree
Plan 1Teams (coming soon): $20/monthPro: $20/month
Plan 2Business: $40/month

Pros & Cons

Continue

Strengths

  • +Fully open source
  • +Works with any LLM (local or cloud)
  • +Supports VS Code and JetBrains
  • +Highly customizable

Limitations

  • -Requires configuration for best results
  • -Less polished than Cursor/Copilot
  • -Quality depends on chosen model

Platforms

macwindowslinux
Cursor

Strengths

  • +Excellent multi-file editing with Composer
  • +Fast and accurate code completion
  • +VS Code-based so familiar UX
  • +Supports multiple AI models

Limitations

  • -Subscription required for full features
  • -Can be resource-intensive
  • -Privacy concerns with cloud processing

Platforms

macwindowslinux

Related Tool Comparisons